Skip to Content
Main content

HARLEM CHLDRN ZONE ACADEMY II GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

80

20%

LEVEL 2

137

35%

LEVEL 3

124

31%

LEVEL 4

56

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

36

8%

LEVEL 2

154

35%

LEVEL 3

152

34%

LEVEL 4

103

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

35

17%

LEVEL 2

86

42%

LEVEL 3

51

25%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

82

36%

LEVEL 3

79

35%

LEVEL 4

48

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

45

23%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

73

38%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

128
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

72

33%

LEVEL 3

73

34%

LEVEL 4

55

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

159
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

68

20%

LEVEL 2

120

35%

LEVEL 3

112

32%

LEVEL 4

47

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

217
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

128

34%

LEVEL 3

134

36%

LEVEL 4

83

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

22

38%

LEVEL 3

14

24%

LEVEL 4

16

28%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

47

15%

LEVEL 2

112

35%

LEVEL 3

109

34%

LEVEL 4

53

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

107

30%

LEVEL 3

139

39%

LEVEL 4

92

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

33

43%

LEVEL 2

25

33%

LEVEL 3

15

20%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

18

20%

LEVEL 2

47

53%

LEVEL 3

13

15%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

173
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

75

20%

LEVEL 2

133

35%

LEVEL 3

118

31%

LEVEL 4

55

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

246
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

35

8%

LEVEL 2

147

34%

LEVEL 3

148

35%

LEVEL 4

98

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

34

38%

LEVEL 3

30

33%

LEVEL 4

19

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

24

47%

LEVEL 4

9

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

73

24%

LEVEL 2

103

34%

LEVEL 3

94

31%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

222
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

33

8%

LEVEL 2

139

35%

LEVEL 3

128

32%

LEVEL 4

94

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.