Skip to Content
Main content

KAPPA GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

87

34%

LEVEL 2

108

42%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

69

33%

LEVEL 2

71

33%

LEVEL 3

48

23%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

49

31%

LEVEL 2

76

48%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

30

27%

LEVEL 2

44

39%

LEVEL 3

26

23%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

38

40%

LEVEL 2

32

33%

LEVEL 3

15

16%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

39

39%

LEVEL 2

27

27%

LEVEL 3

22

22%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

53

40%

LEVEL 2

57

43%

LEVEL 3

15

11%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

39

40%

LEVEL 2

34

35%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

29

27%

LEVEL 2

50

47%

LEVEL 3

19

18%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

27

26%

LEVEL 2

35

34%

LEVEL 3

27

26%

LEVEL 4

14

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

71

31%

LEVEL 2

99

43%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

49

27%

LEVEL 2

64

35%

LEVEL 3

47

26%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

16

62%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

20

69%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

59
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

70

31%

LEVEL 2

99

43%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

70
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

48

27%

LEVEL 2

63

35%

LEVEL 3

46

25%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

17

63%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

21

68%

LEVEL 2

8

26%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

11

42%

LEVEL 2

14

54%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

9

30%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

76

33%

LEVEL 2

94

41%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

60

33%

LEVEL 2

62

34%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.