Skip to Content
Main content

QUEENS SCHOOL OF INQUIRY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

49

21%

LEVEL 2

100

43%

LEVEL 3

61

26%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

44

21%

LEVEL 2

102

48%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

30

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

18

17%

LEVEL 2

42

40%

LEVEL 3

34

33%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

14

13%

LEVEL 2

54

52%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

18

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

31

24%

LEVEL 2

58

45%

LEVEL 3

27

21%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

30

28%

LEVEL 2

48

44%

LEVEL 3

19

17%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

50
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

36

38%

LEVEL 3

35

37%

LEVEL 4

15

16%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

40
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

11

12%

LEVEL 2

43

46%

LEVEL 3

18

19%

LEVEL 4

22

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

13
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

6

15%

LEVEL 2

20

51%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

8

26%

LEVEL 2

18

58%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

20

30%

LEVEL 2

30

45%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

19

35%

LEVEL 2

25

45%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

88

44%

LEVEL 3

60

30%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

27

15%

LEVEL 2

93

51%

LEVEL 3

35

19%

LEVEL 4

29

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

17

55%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

17

59%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

83
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

45

20%

LEVEL 2

97

43%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

66
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

41

20%

LEVEL 2

97

48%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

17

19%

LEVEL 2

38

42%

LEVEL 3

23

26%

LEVEL 4

12

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

11

16%

LEVEL 2

32

46%

LEVEL 3

15

22%

LEVEL 4

11

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

32

22%

LEVEL 2

62

43%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

33

23%

LEVEL 2

70

49%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.