Skip to Content
Main content

UFT CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

216

51%

LEVEL 2

136

32%

LEVEL 3

50

12%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

252

62%

LEVEL 2

113

28%

LEVEL 3

35

9%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

111

51%

LEVEL 2

69

32%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

18
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

129

62%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

17

8%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

105

50%

LEVEL 2

67

32%

LEVEL 3

24

12%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

123

63%

LEVEL 2

52

27%

LEVEL 3

18

9%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

62
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

169

50%

LEVEL 2

105

31%

LEVEL 3

41

12%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

187

61%

LEVEL 2

90

29%

LEVEL 3

25

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

43

52%

LEVEL 2

29

35%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

57

68%

LEVEL 2

18

21%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

180

47%

LEVEL 2

129

34%

LEVEL 3

48

13%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

215

60%

LEVEL 2

108

30%

LEVEL 3

34

9%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

36

77%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

37

86%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

38
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

243

62%

LEVEL 2

111

28%

LEVEL 3

34

9%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

23

48%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

24

62%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

193

51%

LEVEL 2

119

31%

LEVEL 3

44

12%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

228

62%

LEVEL 2

102

28%

LEVEL 3

31

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.