Skip to Content
Main content

ACHIEVEMENT FIRST BUSHWICK CS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

342
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

41

8%

LEVEL 2

146

28%

LEVEL 3

198

37%

LEVEL 4

144

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

351
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

28

5%

LEVEL 2

156

29%

LEVEL 3

200

37%

LEVEL 4

151

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

191
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

66

24%

LEVEL 3

114

42%

LEVEL 4

77

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

179
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

101

38%

LEVEL 4

78

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

151
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

80

31%

LEVEL 3

84

33%

LEVEL 4

67

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

172
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

99

37%

LEVEL 4

73

27%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

141
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

58

28%

LEVEL 3

91

44%

LEVEL 4

50

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

182
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

81

28%

LEVEL 3

100

34%

LEVEL 4

82

28%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

205
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

98

30%

LEVEL 3

107

33%

LEVEL 4

98

30%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

323
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

15

3%

LEVEL 2

112

25%

LEVEL 3

182

40%

LEVEL 4

141

31%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

326
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

13

3%

LEVEL 2

110

24%

LEVEL 3

184

41%

LEVEL 4

142

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

26

33%

LEVEL 2

34

43%

LEVEL 3

16

20%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

15

17%

LEVEL 2

46

53%

LEVEL 3

16

19%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

336
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

36

7%

LEVEL 2

134

26%

LEVEL 3

193

38%

LEVEL 4

143

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

350
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

26

5%

LEVEL 2

144

28%

LEVEL 3

200

38%

LEVEL 4

150

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

5

22%

LEVEL 2

12

52%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

12

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

15

20%

LEVEL 3

30

39%

LEVEL 4

25

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

24

29%

LEVEL 3

35

43%

LEVEL 4

20

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

287
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

35

8%

LEVEL 2

131

29%

LEVEL 3

168

37%

LEVEL 4

119

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

296
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

132

29%

LEVEL 3

165

36%

LEVEL 4

131

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.