Skip to Content
Main content

BRONX GREEN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

30
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

190

52%

LEVEL 2

147

40%

LEVEL 3

25

7%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

194

54%

LEVEL 2

123

35%

LEVEL 3

32

9%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

15
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

88

52%

LEVEL 2

67

39%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

79

48%

LEVEL 2

65

40%

LEVEL 3

17

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

102

52%

LEVEL 2

80

41%

LEVEL 3

12

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

115

60%

LEVEL 2

58

30%

LEVEL 3

15

8%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

13

39%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

15

41%

LEVEL 2

18

49%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

47

57%

LEVEL 2

27

33%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

42

51%

LEVEL 2

30

36%

LEVEL 3

10

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

112

51%

LEVEL 2

96

44%

LEVEL 3

10

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

127

61%

LEVEL 2

65

31%

LEVEL 3

11

5%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

28
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

131

46%

LEVEL 2

127

44%

LEVEL 3

24

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

36
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

123

46%

LEVEL 2

111

41%

LEVEL 3

29

11%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

59

73%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

71

83%

LEVEL 2

12

14%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

28
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

136

47%

LEVEL 2

126

43%

LEVEL 3

23

8%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

39
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

140

49%

LEVEL 2

105

37%

LEVEL 3

32

11%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

54

70%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

54

75%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

11

58%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

11

48%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

179

51%

LEVEL 2

142

41%

LEVEL 3

23

7%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

183

55%

LEVEL 2

117

35%

LEVEL 3

28

8%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.