Skip to Content
Main content

YOUNG WOMENS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

36

14%

LEVEL 2

96

38%

LEVEL 3

86

34%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

30

13%

LEVEL 2

109

46%

LEVEL 3

63

26%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

39
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

22

33%

LEVEL 3

27

41%

LEVEL 4

12

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

39
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

27

38%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

18

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

31
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

26

47%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

15
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

6

15%

LEVEL 2

19

48%

LEVEL 3

12

30%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

16

14%

LEVEL 2

51

46%

LEVEL 3

31

28%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

12

11%

LEVEL 2

54

51%

LEVEL 3

26

25%

LEVEL 4

14

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

93

40%

LEVEL 3

85

36%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

101

46%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

13

76%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

11

55%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

117
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

31

13%

LEVEL 2

94

39%

LEVEL 3

85

35%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

100
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

26

11%

LEVEL 2

105

45%

LEVEL 3

63

27%

LEVEL 4

37

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

14

41%

LEVEL 3

15

44%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

17

43%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

33

15%

LEVEL 2

82

38%

LEVEL 3

71

33%

LEVEL 4

30

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

92

46%

LEVEL 3

50

25%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.