Skip to Content
Main content

GASKILL PREPARATORY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

259

54%

LEVEL 2

168

35%

LEVEL 3

46

10%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

13
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

191

65%

LEVEL 2

88

30%

LEVEL 3

13

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

136

56%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

21

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

86

63%

LEVEL 2

44

32%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

123

51%

LEVEL 2

85

35%

LEVEL 3

25

10%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

7
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

105

67%

LEVEL 2

44

28%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

14

70%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

21

72%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

29
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

75

42%

LEVEL 2

75

42%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

50

50%

LEVEL 2

45

45%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

136

62%

LEVEL 2

66

30%

LEVEL 3

17

8%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

107

77%

LEVEL 2

26

19%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

13

43%

LEVEL 2

15

50%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

13

65%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

203

49%

LEVEL 2

157

38%

LEVEL 3

46

11%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

13
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

146

60%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

13

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

56

84%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

45

90%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

48

39%

LEVEL 2

48

39%

LEVEL 3

18

15%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

39

56%

LEVEL 2

25

36%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

211

59%

LEVEL 2

120

33%

LEVEL 3

28

8%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

152

68%

LEVEL 2

63

28%

LEVEL 3

7

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.