Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS - HARLEM 3 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

372
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

21

5%

LEVEL 3

95

24%

LEVEL 4

277

70%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

498
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

36

7%

LEVEL 3

144

27%

LEVEL 4

354

66%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

200
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

13

6%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

148

69%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

260
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

19

7%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

191

68%

MALE

PROFICIENT

172
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

8

4%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

129

71%

MALE

PROFICIENT

238
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

17

7%

LEVEL 3

75

29%

LEVEL 4

163

63%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

10
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

7

58%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

231
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

14

6%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

166

67%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

322
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

22

6%

LEVEL 3

93

27%

LEVEL 4

229

66%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

124
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

5%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

99

76%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

154
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

12

7%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

108

65%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

339
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

16

5%

LEVEL 3

77

22%

LEVEL 4

262

74%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

453
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

24

5%

LEVEL 3

119

25%

LEVEL 4

334

70%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

33
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

18

46%

LEVEL 4

15

38%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

45
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

25

41%

LEVEL 4

20

33%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

359
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

21

6%

LEVEL 3

88

23%

LEVEL 4

271

71%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

54%

LEVEL 4

6

46%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

23

28%

LEVEL 4

59

71%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

6%

LEVEL 3

28

24%

LEVEL 4

82

70%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

290
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

20

6%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

218

70%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

388
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

29

7%

LEVEL 3

116

28%

LEVEL 4

272

65%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.