Skip to Content
Main content

HAMPTON BAYS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 543

LEVEL 1

156

29%

LEVEL 2

222

41%

LEVEL 3

138

25%

LEVEL 4

27

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

132

38%

LEVEL 2

113

33%

LEVEL 3

69

20%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

79

29%

LEVEL 2

105

39%

LEVEL 3

70

26%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

80

45%

LEVEL 2

52

30%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

77

28%

LEVEL 2

117

43%

LEVEL 3

68

25%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

52

31%

LEVEL 2

61

36%

LEVEL 3

41

24%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

93
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

39

18%

LEVEL 2

90

41%

LEVEL 3

76

34%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

45
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

15

16%

LEVEL 2

33

35%

LEVEL 3

25

27%

LEVEL 4

20

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

68
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

115

37%

LEVEL 2

126

41%

LEVEL 3

58

19%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

52
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

116

48%

LEVEL 2

75

31%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

115

24%

LEVEL 2

199

42%

LEVEL 3

133

28%

LEVEL 4

26

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

102

33%

LEVEL 2

107

35%

LEVEL 3

67

22%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

41

59%

LEVEL 2

23

33%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

30

77%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

164
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

89

19%

LEVEL 2

211

45%

LEVEL 3

137

30%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

95
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

61

24%

LEVEL 2

103

40%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

67

85%

LEVEL 2

11

14%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

71

84%

LEVEL 2

10

12%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

77

24%

LEVEL 2

133

41%

LEVEL 3

96

29%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

35

28%

LEVEL 2

39

31%

LEVEL 3

32

25%

LEVEL 4

21

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

79

36%

LEVEL 2

89

41%

LEVEL 3

42

19%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

97

45%

LEVEL 2

74

34%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.