Skip to Content
Main content

EVERGREEN CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

36

24%

LEVEL 2

64

43%

LEVEL 3

40

27%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

30

21%

LEVEL 2

52

36%

LEVEL 3

46

32%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

22

27%

LEVEL 2

36

44%

LEVEL 3

19

23%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

20

24%

LEVEL 2

31

38%

LEVEL 3

24

29%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

14

21%

LEVEL 2

28

42%

LEVEL 3

21

31%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

21

33%

LEVEL 3

22

35%

LEVEL 4

10

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

9

20%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

17

37%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

23

24%

LEVEL 2

44

46%

LEVEL 3

23

24%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

21

23%

LEVEL 2

34

37%

LEVEL 3

27

29%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

29

21%

LEVEL 2

59

43%

LEVEL 3

40

29%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

24

18%

LEVEL 2

50

37%

LEVEL 3

44

33%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

47
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

25

20%

LEVEL 2

51

41%

LEVEL 3

38

31%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

60
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

19

16%

LEVEL 2

43

35%

LEVEL 3

43

35%

LEVEL 4

17

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

11

42%

LEVEL 2

13

50%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

11

48%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

15

44%

LEVEL 3

12

35%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

9

50%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

30

26%

LEVEL 2

49

43%

LEVEL 3

28

24%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

26

20%

LEVEL 2

51

40%

LEVEL 3

37

29%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.