ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

71

29%

LEVEL 3

87

36%

LEVEL 4

62

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

38

11%

LEVEL 2

144

40%

LEVEL 3

117

33%

LEVEL 4

58

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

36

30%

LEVEL 4

37

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

71

38%

LEVEL 3

64

34%

LEVEL 4

34

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

34

28%

LEVEL 3

51

42%

LEVEL 4

25

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

73

43%

LEVEL 3

53

31%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

121
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

71

36%

LEVEL 4

50

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

136
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

109

39%

LEVEL 3

94

34%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

12

35%

LEVEL 4

8

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

30

45%

LEVEL 3

19

29%

LEVEL 4

12

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

67

29%

LEVEL 3

85

37%

LEVEL 4

62

27%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

132

40%

LEVEL 3

116

35%

LEVEL 4

58

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

10

43%

LEVEL 2

12

52%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

174
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

36

10%

LEVEL 2

141

40%

LEVEL 3

116

33%

LEVEL 4

58

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

18

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

20

38%

LEVEL 3

17

33%

LEVEL 4

9

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

58

30%

LEVEL 3

75

38%

LEVEL 4

44

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

32

10%

LEVEL 2

124

41%

LEVEL 3

100

33%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.