SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

109

27%

LEVEL 2

156

39%

LEVEL 3

98

24%

LEVEL 4

40

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

107

25%

LEVEL 2

172

40%

LEVEL 3

98

23%

LEVEL 4

52

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

37

24%

LEVEL 2

64

42%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

33

19%

LEVEL 2

69

40%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

72

29%

LEVEL 2

92

37%

LEVEL 3

62

25%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

74

29%

LEVEL 2

103

40%

LEVEL 3

49

19%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

39
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

33

31%

LEVEL 2

33

31%

LEVEL 3

27

26%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

40
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

30

27%

LEVEL 2

40

36%

LEVEL 3

22

20%

LEVEL 4

18

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

95
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

71

25%

LEVEL 2

118

42%

LEVEL 3

68

24%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

100
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

73

24%

LEVEL 2

127

42%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

79

24%

LEVEL 2

130

39%

LEVEL 3

90

27%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

69

20%

LEVEL 2

139

40%

LEVEL 3

91

26%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

30

45%

LEVEL 2

26

39%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

38

47%

LEVEL 2

33

41%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

128
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

71

22%

LEVEL 2

124

38%

LEVEL 3

89

28%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

144
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

62

18%

LEVEL 2

141

41%

LEVEL 3

92

27%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

38

48%

LEVEL 2

32

40%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

45

55%

LEVEL 2

31

38%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

16

42%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

16

42%

LEVEL 2

15

39%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

97

27%

LEVEL 2

140

38%

LEVEL 3

88

24%

LEVEL 4

40

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

91

23%

LEVEL 2

157

40%

LEVEL 3

94

24%

LEVEL 4

49

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.