Skip to Content
Main content

BUSHWICK ASCEND CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

41

21%

LEVEL 2

86

44%

LEVEL 3

54

28%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

64

22%

LEVEL 2

122

42%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

19

19%

LEVEL 2

45

45%

LEVEL 3

29

29%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

30

21%

LEVEL 2

67

47%

LEVEL 3

31

22%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

22

23%

LEVEL 2

41

44%

LEVEL 3

25

27%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

34

23%

LEVEL 2

55

38%

LEVEL 3

45

31%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

24

27%

LEVEL 2

40

44%

LEVEL 3

24

27%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

32
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

24

23%

LEVEL 2

49

47%

LEVEL 3

27

26%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

13

13%

LEVEL 2

45

45%

LEVEL 3

29

29%

LEVEL 4

12

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

70
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

38

21%

LEVEL 2

72

40%

LEVEL 3

49

27%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

34

20%

LEVEL 2

77

44%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

47

19%

LEVEL 2

111

44%

LEVEL 3

69

27%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

17

46%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

66
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

40

21%

LEVEL 2

83

44%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

101
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

56

20%

LEVEL 2

118

43%

LEVEL 3

74

27%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

10

59%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

16

46%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

39

22%

LEVEL 2

76

43%

LEVEL 3

50

28%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

58

23%

LEVEL 2

106

42%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.