Skip to Content
Main content

DEMOCRACY PREP HARLEM CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

42

13%

LEVEL 2

168

52%

LEVEL 3

86

27%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

52

16%

LEVEL 2

161

49%

LEVEL 3

94

29%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

25

15%

LEVEL 2

80

48%

LEVEL 3

49

30%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

88

50%

LEVEL 3

56

32%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

17

11%

LEVEL 2

88

56%

LEVEL 3

37

24%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

32

21%

LEVEL 2

73

48%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

76
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

30

13%

LEVEL 2

122

54%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

73
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

42

19%

LEVEL 2

111

49%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

12

14%

LEVEL 2

45

51%

LEVEL 3

22

25%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

49

52%

LEVEL 3

30

32%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

128

50%

LEVEL 3

77

30%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

124

48%

LEVEL 3

87

34%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

15

23%

LEVEL 2

40

62%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

28

38%

LEVEL 2

37

51%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

106
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

37

12%

LEVEL 2

156

52%

LEVEL 3

84

28%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

113
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

41

13%

LEVEL 2

155

50%

LEVEL 3

91

29%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

12

50%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

5

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

11

55%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

14

12%

LEVEL 2

59

50%

LEVEL 3

33

28%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

17

14%

LEVEL 2

54

45%

LEVEL 3

41

34%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

28

14%

LEVEL 2

109

53%

LEVEL 3

53

26%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

35

17%

LEVEL 2

107

51%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.