UNITY PREP CHARTER SCH OF BROOKLYN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

80

61%

LEVEL 2

39

30%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

113

50%

LEVEL 2

74

33%

LEVEL 3

29

13%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

29

62%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

19
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

44

46%

LEVEL 2

32

34%

LEVEL 3

13

14%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

51

61%

LEVEL 2

25

30%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

69

53%

LEVEL 2

42

32%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

67

64%

LEVEL 2

31

30%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

91

52%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

10

50%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

19

46%

LEVEL 2

15

37%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

11
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

53

52%

LEVEL 2

37

37%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

70

41%

LEVEL 2

66

39%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

27

90%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

43

80%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

36
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

107

50%

LEVEL 2

71

33%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

12

52%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

19

40%

LEVEL 2

18

38%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

68

63%

LEVEL 2

29

27%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

94

53%

LEVEL 2

56

32%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.