Skip to Content
Main content

BROOME COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,616
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,883

LEVEL 1

3,045

31%

LEVEL 2

3,222

33%

LEVEL 3

2,295

23%

LEVEL 4

1,321

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,517
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,850

LEVEL 1

3,070

31%

LEVEL 2

3,263

33%

LEVEL 3

2,179

22%

LEVEL 4

1,338

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,710
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,703

LEVEL 1

1,421

30%

LEVEL 2

1,572

33%

LEVEL 3

1,111

24%

LEVEL 4

599

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,704
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,787

LEVEL 1

1,457

30%

LEVEL 2

1,626

34%

LEVEL 3

1,073

22%

LEVEL 4

631

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,906
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,180

LEVEL 1

1,624

31%

LEVEL 2

1,650

32%

LEVEL 3

1,184

23%

LEVEL 4

722

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,813
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,063

LEVEL 1

1,613

32%

LEVEL 2

1,637

32%

LEVEL 3

1,106

22%

LEVEL 4

707

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

132
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 503

LEVEL 1

203

40%

LEVEL 2

168

33%

LEVEL 3

81

16%

LEVEL 4

51

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

141
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

239

43%

LEVEL 2

181

32%

LEVEL 3

87

16%

LEVEL 4

54

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

12

52%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

9

41%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

192
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

63

18%

LEVEL 2

105

29%

LEVEL 3

85

24%

LEVEL 4

107

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

194
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

52

15%

LEVEL 2

106

30%

LEVEL 3

108

31%

LEVEL 4

86

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3,054
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,369

LEVEL 1

1,830

25%

LEVEL 2

2,485

34%

LEVEL 3

1,952

26%

LEVEL 4

1,102

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,954
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,300

LEVEL 1

1,856

25%

LEVEL 2

2,490

34%

LEVEL 3

1,822

25%

LEVEL 4

1,132

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

114
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,013

LEVEL 1

628

62%

LEVEL 2

271

27%

LEVEL 3

88

9%

LEVEL 4

26

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

97
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 986

LEVEL 1

611

62%

LEVEL 2

278

28%

LEVEL 3

76

8%

LEVEL 4

21

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

119
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 615

LEVEL 1

309

50%

LEVEL 2

187

30%

LEVEL 3

86

14%

LEVEL 4

33

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

125
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 629

LEVEL 1

303

48%

LEVEL 2

201

32%

LEVEL 3

82

13%

LEVEL 4

43

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,503
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,341

LEVEL 1

1,933

23%

LEVEL 2

2,905

35%

LEVEL 3

2,207

26%

LEVEL 4

1,296

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,414
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,359

LEVEL 1

1,975

24%

LEVEL 2

2,970

36%

LEVEL 3

2,096

25%

LEVEL 4

1,318

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

113
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,542

LEVEL 1

1,112

72%

LEVEL 2

317

21%

LEVEL 3

88

6%

LEVEL 4

25

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

103
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,491

LEVEL 1

1,095

73%

LEVEL 2

293

20%

LEVEL 3

83

6%

LEVEL 4

20

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3,596
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,694

LEVEL 1

2,916

30%

LEVEL 2

3,182

33%

LEVEL 3

2,280

24%

LEVEL 4

1,316

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3,494
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,656

LEVEL 1

2,944

30%

LEVEL 2

3,218

33%

LEVEL 3

2,160

22%

LEVEL 4

1,334

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

20
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

129

68%

LEVEL 2

40

21%

LEVEL 3

15

8%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

23
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

126

65%

LEVEL 2

45

23%

LEVEL 3

19

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,372
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,573

LEVEL 1

727

16%

LEVEL 2

1,474

32%

LEVEL 3

1,394

30%

LEVEL 4

978

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,285
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,436

LEVEL 1

704

16%

LEVEL 2

1,447

33%

LEVEL 3

1,329

30%

LEVEL 4

956

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,244
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,310

LEVEL 1

2,318

44%

LEVEL 2

1,748

33%

LEVEL 3

901

17%

LEVEL 4

343

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,232
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,414

LEVEL 1

2,366

44%

LEVEL 2

1,816

34%

LEVEL 3

850

16%

LEVEL 4

382

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

3,614
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,878

LEVEL 1

3,043

31%

LEVEL 2

3,221

33%

LEVEL 3

2,293

23%

LEVEL 4

1,321

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.