Skip to Content
Main content

ERIE COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12,565
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 35,734

LEVEL 1

12,520

35%

LEVEL 2

10,649

30%

LEVEL 3

7,801

22%

LEVEL 4

4,764

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12,292
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 35,107

LEVEL 1

12,349

35%

LEVEL 2

10,466

30%

LEVEL 3

7,164

20%

LEVEL 4

5,128

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

6,214
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,364

LEVEL 1

5,808

33%

LEVEL 2

5,342

31%

LEVEL 3

3,917

23%

LEVEL 4

2,297

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5,968
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,003

LEVEL 1

5,710

34%

LEVEL 2

5,325

31%

LEVEL 3

3,570

21%

LEVEL 4

2,398

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

6,351
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,370

LEVEL 1

6,712

37%

LEVEL 2

5,307

29%

LEVEL 3

3,884

21%

LEVEL 4

2,467

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

6,324
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,104

LEVEL 1

6,639

37%

LEVEL 2

5,141

28%

LEVEL 3

3,594

20%

LEVEL 4

2,730

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

351
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 978

LEVEL 1

319

33%

LEVEL 2

308

31%

LEVEL 3

219

22%

LEVEL 4

132

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

375
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,090

LEVEL 1

372

34%

LEVEL 2

343

31%

LEVEL 3

216

20%

LEVEL 4

159

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

69
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

151

44%

LEVEL 2

124

36%

LEVEL 3

54

16%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

62
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

130

42%

LEVEL 2

118

38%

LEVEL 3

46

15%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

996
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,205

LEVEL 1

697

32%

LEVEL 2

512

23%

LEVEL 3

504

23%

LEVEL 4

492

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,010
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,292

LEVEL 1

706

31%

LEVEL 2

576

25%

LEVEL 3

475

21%

LEVEL 4

535

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9,425
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,079

LEVEL 1

3,605

19%

LEVEL 2

6,049

32%

LEVEL 3

5,712

30%

LEVEL 4

3,713

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9,087
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,561

LEVEL 1

3,616

19%

LEVEL 2

5,858

32%

LEVEL 3

5,183

28%

LEVEL 4

3,904

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,123
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,531

LEVEL 1

5,773

61%

LEVEL 2

2,635

28%

LEVEL 3

874

9%

LEVEL 4

249

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,128
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,096

LEVEL 1

5,439

60%

LEVEL 2

2,529

28%

LEVEL 3

812

9%

LEVEL 4

316

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

601
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,597

LEVEL 1

1,975

55%

LEVEL 2

1,021

28%

LEVEL 3

438

12%

LEVEL 4

163

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

630
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,758

LEVEL 1

2,086

56%

LEVEL 2

1,042

28%

LEVEL 3

432

11%

LEVEL 4

198

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12,047
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 29,792

LEVEL 1

8,284

28%

LEVEL 2

9,461

32%

LEVEL 3

7,394

25%

LEVEL 4

4,653

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

11,829
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 29,337

LEVEL 1

8,222

28%

LEVEL 2

9,286

32%

LEVEL 3

6,842

23%

LEVEL 4

4,987

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

518
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,942

LEVEL 1

4,236

71%

LEVEL 2

1,188

20%

LEVEL 3

407

7%

LEVEL 4

111

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

463
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,770

LEVEL 1

4,127

72%

LEVEL 2

1,180

20%

LEVEL 3

322

6%

LEVEL 4

141

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12,407
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 33,253

LEVEL 1

10,629

32%

LEVEL 2

10,217

31%

LEVEL 3

7,682

23%

LEVEL 4

4,725

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12,146
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 32,485

LEVEL 1

10,360

32%

LEVEL 2

9,979

31%

LEVEL 3

7,048

22%

LEVEL 4

5,098

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

158
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,481

LEVEL 1

1,891

76%

LEVEL 2

432

17%

LEVEL 3

119

5%

LEVEL 4

39

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

146
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,622

LEVEL 1

1,989

76%

LEVEL 2

487

19%

LEVEL 3

116

4%

LEVEL 4

30

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8,880
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,683

LEVEL 1

2,970

18%

LEVEL 2

4,833

29%

LEVEL 3

5,121

31%

LEVEL 4

3,759

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8,677
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,107

LEVEL 1

2,806

17%

LEVEL 2

4,624

29%

LEVEL 3

4,696

29%

LEVEL 4

3,981

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,685
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,051

LEVEL 1

9,550

50%

LEVEL 2

5,816

31%

LEVEL 3

2,680

14%

LEVEL 4

1,005

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,615
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,000

LEVEL 1

9,543

50%

LEVEL 2

5,842

31%

LEVEL 3

2,468

13%

LEVEL 4

1,147

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.