Skip to Content
Main content

NASSAU COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

27,529
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 53,289

LEVEL 1

10,831

20%

LEVEL 2

14,929

28%

LEVEL 3

14,847

28%

LEVEL 4

12,682

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

25,410
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 46,376

LEVEL 1

8,362

18%

LEVEL 2

12,604

27%

LEVEL 3

12,530

27%

LEVEL 4

12,880

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

13,301
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 25,548

LEVEL 1

4,856

19%

LEVEL 2

7,391

29%

LEVEL 3

7,384

29%

LEVEL 4

5,917

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

12,193
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,151

LEVEL 1

3,687

17%

LEVEL 2

6,271

28%

LEVEL 3

6,237

28%

LEVEL 4

5,956

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14,228
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 27,741

LEVEL 1

5,975

22%

LEVEL 2

7,538

27%

LEVEL 3

7,463

27%

LEVEL 4

6,765

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13,217
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 24,225

LEVEL 1

4,675

19%

LEVEL 2

6,333

26%

LEVEL 3

6,293

26%

LEVEL 4

6,924

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

411
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 671

LEVEL 1

74

11%

LEVEL 2

186

28%

LEVEL 3

202

30%

LEVEL 4

209

31%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

467
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 714

LEVEL 1

65

9%

LEVEL 2

182

25%

LEVEL 3

213

30%

LEVEL 4

254

36%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

35
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

23

26%

LEVEL 2

31

35%

LEVEL 3

23

26%

LEVEL 4

12

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

51
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

17

18%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

30

32%

LEVEL 4

21

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6,640
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,726

LEVEL 1

481

6%

LEVEL 2

1,605

18%

LEVEL 3

2,725

31%

LEVEL 4

3,915

45%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6,719
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,699

LEVEL 1

475

5%

LEVEL 2

1,505

17%

LEVEL 3

2,470

28%

LEVEL 4

4,249

49%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

13,867
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,018

LEVEL 1

1,790

9%

LEVEL 2

5,361

26%

LEVEL 3

7,378

35%

LEVEL 4

6,489

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11,944
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,527

LEVEL 1

1,324

8%

LEVEL 2

4,259

24%

LEVEL 3

5,828

33%

LEVEL 4

6,116

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2,533
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,445

LEVEL 1

2,982

35%

LEVEL 2

2,930

35%

LEVEL 3

1,751

21%

LEVEL 4

782

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2,351
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,079

LEVEL 1

2,240

32%

LEVEL 2

2,488

35%

LEVEL 3

1,508

21%

LEVEL 4

843

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4,043
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,340

LEVEL 1

5,481

38%

LEVEL 2

4,816

34%

LEVEL 3

2,768

19%

LEVEL 4

1,275

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3,878
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,264

LEVEL 1

4,241

35%

LEVEL 2

4,145

34%

LEVEL 3

2,481

20%

LEVEL 4

1,397

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

26,625
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 47,439

LEVEL 1

7,527

16%

LEVEL 2

13,287

28%

LEVEL 3

14,221

30%

LEVEL 4

12,404

26%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

24,670
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 41,891

LEVEL 1

5,924

14%

LEVEL 2

11,297

27%

LEVEL 3

12,048

29%

LEVEL 4

12,622

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

904
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,850

LEVEL 1

3,304

56%

LEVEL 2

1,642

28%

LEVEL 3

626

11%

LEVEL 4

278

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

740
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,485

LEVEL 1

2,438

54%

LEVEL 2

1,307

29%

LEVEL 3

482

11%

LEVEL 4

258

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

27,045
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 49,004

LEVEL 1

7,969

16%

LEVEL 2

13,990

29%

LEVEL 3

14,518

30%

LEVEL 4

12,527

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

24,977
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 42,605

LEVEL 1

6,005

14%

LEVEL 2

11,623

27%

LEVEL 3

12,248

29%

LEVEL 4

12,729

30%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

484
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,285

LEVEL 1

2,862

67%

LEVEL 2

939

22%

LEVEL 3

329

8%

LEVEL 4

155

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

433
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,771

LEVEL 1

2,357

63%

LEVEL 2

981

26%

LEVEL 3

282

7%

LEVEL 4

151

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22,298
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 35,299

LEVEL 1

4,158

12%

LEVEL 2

8,843

25%

LEVEL 3

11,335

32%

LEVEL 4

10,963

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20,153
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 30,423

LEVEL 1

3,092

10%

LEVEL 2

7,178

24%

LEVEL 3

9,189

30%

LEVEL 4

10,964

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,231
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,990

LEVEL 1

6,673

37%

LEVEL 2

6,086

34%

LEVEL 3

3,512

20%

LEVEL 4

1,719

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,257
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,953

LEVEL 1

5,270

33%

LEVEL 2

5,426

34%

LEVEL 3

3,341

21%

LEVEL 4

1,916

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.