Skip to Content
Main content

QUEENS COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51,773
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 121,242

LEVEL 1

31,040

26%

LEVEL 2

38,429

32%

LEVEL 3

28,281

23%

LEVEL 4

23,492

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52,972
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 122,840

LEVEL 1

31,121

25%

LEVEL 2

38,747

32%

LEVEL 3

26,909

22%

LEVEL 4

26,063

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25,573
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 58,643

LEVEL 1

14,059

24%

LEVEL 2

19,011

32%

LEVEL 3

14,137

24%

LEVEL 4

11,436

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26,037
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 59,383

LEVEL 1

14,135

24%

LEVEL 2

19,211

32%

LEVEL 3

13,392

23%

LEVEL 4

12,645

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26,200
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 62,599

LEVEL 1

16,981

27%

LEVEL 2

19,418

31%

LEVEL 3

14,144

23%

LEVEL 4

12,056

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26,935
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 63,457

LEVEL 1

16,986

27%

LEVEL 2

19,536

31%

LEVEL 3

13,517

21%

LEVEL 4

13,418

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

359
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 597

LEVEL 1

91

15%

LEVEL 2

147

25%

LEVEL 3

161

27%

LEVEL 4

198

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

458
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 754

LEVEL 1

123

16%

LEVEL 2

173

23%

LEVEL 3

189

25%

LEVEL 4

269

36%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

669
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,745

LEVEL 1

496

28%

LEVEL 2

580

33%

LEVEL 3

401

23%

LEVEL 4

268

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

693
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,961

LEVEL 1

606

31%

LEVEL 2

662

34%

LEVEL 3

398

20%

LEVEL 4

295

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23,006
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 34,651

LEVEL 1

3,626

10%

LEVEL 2

8,019

23%

LEVEL 3

9,895

29%

LEVEL 4

13,111

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24,047
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 35,923

LEVEL 1

3,734

10%

LEVEL 2

8,142

23%

LEVEL 3

9,414

26%

LEVEL 4

14,633

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8,701
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,934

LEVEL 1

2,488

16%

LEVEL 2

4,745

30%

LEVEL 3

4,702

30%

LEVEL 4

3,999

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8,646
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,689

LEVEL 1

2,468

16%

LEVEL 2

4,575

29%

LEVEL 3

4,299

27%

LEVEL 4

4,347

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4,797
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,109

LEVEL 1

9,700

44%

LEVEL 2

7,612

34%

LEVEL 3

3,391

15%

LEVEL 4

1,406

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4,634
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,433

LEVEL 1

9,254

43%

LEVEL 2

7,545

35%

LEVEL 3

3,176

15%

LEVEL 4

1,458

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14,241
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 46,206

LEVEL 1

14,639

32%

LEVEL 2

17,326

37%

LEVEL 3

9,731

21%

LEVEL 4

4,510

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14,494
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 47,080

LEVEL 1

14,936

32%

LEVEL 2

17,650

37%

LEVEL 3

9,433

20%

LEVEL 4

5,061

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48,777
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 99,607

LEVEL 1

18,685

19%

LEVEL 2

32,145

32%

LEVEL 3

26,074

26%

LEVEL 4

22,703

23%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49,975
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 100,634

LEVEL 1

18,512

18%

LEVEL 2

32,147

32%

LEVEL 3

24,827

25%

LEVEL 4

25,148

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2,996
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,635

LEVEL 1

12,355

57%

LEVEL 2

6,284

29%

LEVEL 3

2,207

10%

LEVEL 4

789

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2,997
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,206

LEVEL 1

12,609

57%

LEVEL 2

6,600

30%

LEVEL 3

2,082

9%

LEVEL 4

915

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

48,894
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 105,745

LEVEL 1

23,179

22%

LEVEL 2

33,672

32%

LEVEL 3

26,337

25%

LEVEL 4

22,557

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

50,461
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 107,470

LEVEL 1

23,073

21%

LEVEL 2

33,936

32%

LEVEL 3

25,201

23%

LEVEL 4

25,260

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2,879
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,497

LEVEL 1

7,861

51%

LEVEL 2

4,757

31%

LEVEL 3

1,944

13%

LEVEL 4

935

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2,511
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,370

LEVEL 1

8,048

52%

LEVEL 2

4,811

31%

LEVEL 3

1,708

11%

LEVEL 4

803

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18,726
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 34,910

LEVEL 1

6,424

18%

LEVEL 2

9,760

28%

LEVEL 3

9,174

26%

LEVEL 4

9,552

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19,783
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 37,068

LEVEL 1

6,955

19%

LEVEL 2

10,330

28%

LEVEL 3

8,863

24%

LEVEL 4

10,920

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33,047
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 86,332

LEVEL 1

24,616

29%

LEVEL 2

28,669

33%

LEVEL 3

19,107

22%

LEVEL 4

13,940

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33,189
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 85,772

LEVEL 1

24,166

28%

LEVEL 2

28,417

33%

LEVEL 3

18,046

21%

LEVEL 4

15,143

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.