Skip to Content
Main content

RICHMOND COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,028
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,154

LEVEL 1

7,296

28%

LEVEL 2

8,830

34%

LEVEL 3

6,014

23%

LEVEL 4

4,014

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,299
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,049

LEVEL 1

7,281

28%

LEVEL 2

8,469

33%

LEVEL 3

5,806

22%

LEVEL 4

4,493

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4,929
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,722

LEVEL 1

3,357

26%

LEVEL 2

4,436

35%

LEVEL 3

2,943

23%

LEVEL 4

1,986

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5,111
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,581

LEVEL 1

3,308

26%

LEVEL 2

4,162

33%

LEVEL 3

2,927

23%

LEVEL 4

2,184

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5,099
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,432

LEVEL 1

3,939

29%

LEVEL 2

4,394

33%

LEVEL 3

3,071

23%

LEVEL 4

2,028

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5,188
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,468

LEVEL 1

3,973

29%

LEVEL 2

4,307

32%

LEVEL 3

2,879

21%

LEVEL 4

2,309

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

75
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

58

29%

LEVEL 2

69

34%

LEVEL 3

41

20%

LEVEL 4

34

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

119
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

70

26%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

54

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

38
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

29

28%

LEVEL 2

35

34%

LEVEL 3

23

23%

LEVEL 4

15

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

45
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

31

26%

LEVEL 2

41

35%

LEVEL 3

23

20%

LEVEL 4

22

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,385
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,056

LEVEL 1

187

9%

LEVEL 2

484

24%

LEVEL 3

623

30%

LEVEL 4

762

37%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,369
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,024

LEVEL 1

209

10%

LEVEL 2

446

22%

LEVEL 3

583

29%

LEVEL 4

786

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6,188
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,971

LEVEL 1

2,330

18%

LEVEL 2

4,453

34%

LEVEL 3

3,637

28%

LEVEL 4

2,551

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6,335
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,625

LEVEL 1

2,197

17%

LEVEL 2

4,093

32%

LEVEL 3

3,466

27%

LEVEL 4

2,869

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

618
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,676

LEVEL 1

1,828

50%

LEVEL 2

1,230

33%

LEVEL 3

475

13%

LEVEL 4

143

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

622
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,626

LEVEL 1

1,840

51%

LEVEL 2

1,164

32%

LEVEL 3

452

12%

LEVEL 4

170

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,724
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,147

LEVEL 1

2,864

40%

LEVEL 2

2,559

36%

LEVEL 3

1,215

17%

LEVEL 4

509

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,809
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,392

LEVEL 1

2,934

40%

LEVEL 2

2,649

36%

LEVEL 3

1,217

16%

LEVEL 4

592

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9,162
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,009

LEVEL 1

3,110

16%

LEVEL 2

6,737

35%

LEVEL 3

5,349

28%

LEVEL 4

3,813

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9,422
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,848

LEVEL 1

3,161

17%

LEVEL 2

6,265

33%

LEVEL 3

5,148

27%

LEVEL 4

4,274

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

866
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,145

LEVEL 1

4,186

59%

LEVEL 2

2,093

29%

LEVEL 3

665

9%

LEVEL 4

201

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

877
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,201

LEVEL 1

4,120

57%

LEVEL 2

2,204

31%

LEVEL 3

658

9%

LEVEL 4

219

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9,872
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 24,741

LEVEL 1

6,406

26%

LEVEL 2

8,463

34%

LEVEL 3

5,892

24%

LEVEL 4

3,980

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10,162
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 24,639

LEVEL 1

6,409

26%

LEVEL 2

8,068

33%

LEVEL 3

5,705

23%

LEVEL 4

4,457

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

156
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,413

LEVEL 1

890

63%

LEVEL 2

367

26%

LEVEL 3

122

9%

LEVEL 4

34

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

137
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,410

LEVEL 1

872

62%

LEVEL 2

401

28%

LEVEL 3

101

7%

LEVEL 4

36

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,660
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,919

LEVEL 1

1,723

16%

LEVEL 2

3,536

32%

LEVEL 3

3,072

28%

LEVEL 4

2,588

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,957
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,982

LEVEL 1

1,715

16%

LEVEL 2

3,310

30%

LEVEL 3

3,061

28%

LEVEL 4

2,896

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,368
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,235

LEVEL 1

5,573

37%

LEVEL 2

5,294

35%

LEVEL 3

2,942

19%

LEVEL 4

1,426

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,342
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,067

LEVEL 1

5,566

37%

LEVEL 2

5,159

34%

LEVEL 3

2,745

18%

LEVEL 4

1,597

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.