Skip to Content
Main content

ONONDAGA COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,865
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,996

LEVEL 1

8,823

38%

LEVEL 2

6,308

27%

LEVEL 3

4,912

21%

LEVEL 4

2,953

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,889
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,875

LEVEL 1

8,624

38%

LEVEL 2

6,362

28%

LEVEL 3

4,685

20%

LEVEL 4

3,204

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,822
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,050

LEVEL 1

4,161

38%

LEVEL 2

3,067

28%

LEVEL 3

2,446

22%

LEVEL 4

1,376

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,734
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,972

LEVEL 1

4,028

37%

LEVEL 2

3,210

29%

LEVEL 3

2,280

21%

LEVEL 4

1,454

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

4,043
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,946

LEVEL 1

4,662

39%

LEVEL 2

3,241

27%

LEVEL 3

2,466

21%

LEVEL 4

1,577

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

4,155
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,903

LEVEL 1

4,596

39%

LEVEL 2

3,152

26%

LEVEL 3

2,405

20%

LEVEL 4

1,750

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

201
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 747

LEVEL 1

314

42%

LEVEL 2

232

31%

LEVEL 3

143

19%

LEVEL 4

58

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

237
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 872

LEVEL 1

370

42%

LEVEL 2

265

30%

LEVEL 3

150

17%

LEVEL 4

87

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

27
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

98

56%

LEVEL 2

49

28%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

23
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

102

56%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

502
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,232

LEVEL 1

473

38%

LEVEL 2

257

21%

LEVEL 3

239

19%

LEVEL 4

263

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

531
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,227

LEVEL 1

431

35%

LEVEL 2

265

22%

LEVEL 3

244

20%

LEVEL 4

287

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6,520
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,291

LEVEL 1

3,380

24%

LEVEL 2

4,391

31%

LEVEL 3

4,040

28%

LEVEL 4

2,480

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6,378
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,918

LEVEL 1

3,190

23%

LEVEL 2

4,350

31%

LEVEL 3

3,773

27%

LEVEL 4

2,605

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

379
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,924

LEVEL 1

3,528

72%

LEVEL 2

1,017

21%

LEVEL 3

301

6%

LEVEL 4

78

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

446
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,031

LEVEL 1

3,551

71%

LEVEL 2

1,034

21%

LEVEL 3

315

6%

LEVEL 4

131

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

236
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,628

LEVEL 1

1,030

63%

LEVEL 2

362

22%

LEVEL 3

168

10%

LEVEL 4

68

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

274
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,646

LEVEL 1

980

60%

LEVEL 2

392

24%

LEVEL 3

187

11%

LEVEL 4

87

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,658
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,588

LEVEL 1

6,163

31%

LEVEL 2

5,767

29%

LEVEL 3

4,753

24%

LEVEL 4

2,905

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,670
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,612

LEVEL 1

6,108

31%

LEVEL 2

5,834

30%

LEVEL 3

4,513

23%

LEVEL 4

3,157

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

207
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,408

LEVEL 1

2,660

78%

LEVEL 2

541

16%

LEVEL 3

159

5%

LEVEL 4

48

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

219
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,263

LEVEL 1

2,516

77%

LEVEL 2

528

16%

LEVEL 3

172

5%

LEVEL 4

47

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7,795
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,573

LEVEL 1

7,639

35%

LEVEL 2

6,139

28%

LEVEL 3

4,862

23%

LEVEL 4

2,933

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7,811
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,321

LEVEL 1

7,377

35%

LEVEL 2

6,133

29%

LEVEL 3

4,629

22%

LEVEL 4

3,182

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

70
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,423

LEVEL 1

1,184

83%

LEVEL 2

169

12%

LEVEL 3

50

4%

LEVEL 4

20

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

78
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,554

LEVEL 1

1,247

80%

LEVEL 2

229

15%

LEVEL 3

56

4%

LEVEL 4

22

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6,244
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,359

LEVEL 1

2,494

20%

LEVEL 2

3,621

29%

LEVEL 3

3,694

30%

LEVEL 4

2,550

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6,132
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,820

LEVEL 1

2,195

19%

LEVEL 2

3,493

30%

LEVEL 3

3,454

29%

LEVEL 4

2,678

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,621
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,637

LEVEL 1

6,329

59%

LEVEL 2

2,687

25%

LEVEL 3

1,218

11%

LEVEL 4

403

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,757
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,055

LEVEL 1

6,429

58%

LEVEL 2

2,869

26%

LEVEL 3

1,231

11%

LEVEL 4

526

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

7,865
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,983

LEVEL 1

8,811

38%

LEVEL 2

6,307

27%

LEVEL 3

4,912

21%

LEVEL 4

2,953

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

7,888
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,813

LEVEL 1

8,573

38%

LEVEL 2

6,352

28%

LEVEL 3

4,684

21%

LEVEL 4

3,204

14%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

12

92%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

51

82%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.