Skip to Content
Main content

ROCKLAND COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

4,554
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,428

LEVEL 1

3,462

30%

LEVEL 2

3,412

30%

LEVEL 3

2,707

24%

LEVEL 4

1,847

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

4,397
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,749

LEVEL 1

3,180

30%

LEVEL 2

3,172

30%

LEVEL 3

2,427

23%

LEVEL 4

1,970

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

2,183
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,406

LEVEL 1

1,603

30%

LEVEL 2

1,620

30%

LEVEL 3

1,337

25%

LEVEL 4

846

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

2,114
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,119

LEVEL 1

1,464

29%

LEVEL 2

1,541

30%

LEVEL 3

1,211

24%

LEVEL 4

903

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,371
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,022

LEVEL 1

1,859

31%

LEVEL 2

1,792

30%

LEVEL 3

1,370

23%

LEVEL 4

1,001

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,283
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,630

LEVEL 1

1,716

30%

LEVEL 2

1,631

29%

LEVEL 3

1,216

22%

LEVEL 4

1,067

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

110
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

31

16%

LEVEL 2

52

27%

LEVEL 3

59

31%

LEVEL 4

51

26%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

110
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

46

26%

LEVEL 3

53

30%

LEVEL 4

57

32%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

6

60%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

760
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,191

LEVEL 1

144

12%

LEVEL 2

287

24%

LEVEL 3

360

30%

LEVEL 4

400

34%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

731
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,090

LEVEL 1

104

10%

LEVEL 2

255

23%

LEVEL 3

318

29%

LEVEL 4

413

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,444
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,099

LEVEL 1

478

12%

LEVEL 2

1,177

29%

LEVEL 3

1,373

33%

LEVEL 4

1,071

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,311
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,690

LEVEL 1

370

10%

LEVEL 2

1,009

27%

LEVEL 3

1,180

32%

LEVEL 4

1,131

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

407
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,093

LEVEL 1

999

48%

LEVEL 2

687

33%

LEVEL 3

313

15%

LEVEL 4

94

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

384
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,935

LEVEL 1

932

48%

LEVEL 2

619

32%

LEVEL 3

266

14%

LEVEL 4

118

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

831
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,841

LEVEL 1

1,805

47%

LEVEL 2

1,205

31%

LEVEL 3

600

16%

LEVEL 4

231

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

859
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,847

LEVEL 1

1,751

46%

LEVEL 2

1,237

32%

LEVEL 3

608

16%

LEVEL 4

251

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

4,409
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,475

LEVEL 1

2,049

22%

LEVEL 2

3,017

32%

LEVEL 3

2,590

27%

LEVEL 4

1,819

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

4,269
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,969

LEVEL 1

1,919

21%

LEVEL 2

2,781

31%

LEVEL 3

2,335

26%

LEVEL 4

1,934

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

145
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,953

LEVEL 1

1,413

72%

LEVEL 2

395

20%

LEVEL 3

117

6%

LEVEL 4

28

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

128
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,780

LEVEL 1

1,261

71%

LEVEL 2

391

22%

LEVEL 3

92

5%

LEVEL 4

36

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4,502
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,166

LEVEL 1

2,428

24%

LEVEL 2

3,236

32%

LEVEL 3

2,670

26%

LEVEL 4

1,832

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4,352
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,385

LEVEL 1

2,098

22%

LEVEL 2

2,935

31%

LEVEL 3

2,391

25%

LEVEL 4

1,961

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

52
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,262

LEVEL 1

1,034

82%

LEVEL 2

176

14%

LEVEL 3

37

3%

LEVEL 4

15

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

45
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,364

LEVEL 1

1,082

79%

LEVEL 2

237

17%

LEVEL 3

36

3%

LEVEL 4

9

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,552
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,189

LEVEL 1

836

14%

LEVEL 2

1,801

29%

LEVEL 3

1,959

32%

LEVEL 4

1,593

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,368
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,585

LEVEL 1

691

12%

LEVEL 2

1,526

27%

LEVEL 3

1,707

31%

LEVEL 4

1,661

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,002
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,239

LEVEL 1

2,626

50%

LEVEL 2

1,611

31%

LEVEL 3

748

14%

LEVEL 4

254

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,029
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,164

LEVEL 1

2,489

48%

LEVEL 2

1,646

32%

LEVEL 3

720

14%

LEVEL 4

309

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.