Skip to Content
Main content

SCHUYLER COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

215

33%

LEVEL 2

240

37%

LEVEL 3

144

22%

LEVEL 4

52

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 701

LEVEL 1

258

37%

LEVEL 2

262

37%

LEVEL 3

123

18%

LEVEL 4

58

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

94

30%

LEVEL 2

128

41%

LEVEL 3

71

23%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

122

36%

LEVEL 2

137

41%

LEVEL 3

50

15%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

121

36%

LEVEL 2

112

33%

LEVEL 3

73

21%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

136

37%

LEVEL 2

125

34%

LEVEL 3

73

20%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

8

62%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

9

38%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

177
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 598

LEVEL 1

197

33%

LEVEL 2

224

37%

LEVEL 3

131

22%

LEVEL 4

46

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

160
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 644

LEVEL 1

237

37%

LEVEL 2

247

38%

LEVEL 3

107

17%

LEVEL 4

53

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

192
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

136

25%

LEVEL 2

223

40%

LEVEL 3

140

25%

LEVEL 4

52

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

160

28%

LEVEL 2

241

41%

LEVEL 3

122

21%

LEVEL 4

58

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

79

79%

LEVEL 2

17

17%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

98

82%

LEVEL 2

21

18%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

192
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 644

LEVEL 1

212

33%

LEVEL 2

240

37%

LEVEL 3

142

22%

LEVEL 4

50

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

126
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

67

21%

LEVEL 2

127

40%

LEVEL 3

91

28%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

79

26%

LEVEL 2

127

41%

LEVEL 3

65

21%

LEVEL 4

38

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

148

45%

LEVEL 2

113

34%

LEVEL 3

53

16%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

179

46%

LEVEL 2

135

34%

LEVEL 3

58

15%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.