GORHAM-MIDDLESEX CSD (MARCUS WHITMAN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

106

34%

LEVEL 2

97

31%

LEVEL 3

78

25%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

109

30%

LEVEL 2

137

38%

LEVEL 3

76

21%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

50

35%

LEVEL 2

52

37%

LEVEL 3

28

20%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

52

30%

LEVEL 2

75

44%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

56

33%

LEVEL 2

45

26%

LEVEL 3

50

29%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

57

30%

LEVEL 2

62

32%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

108
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

103

34%

LEVEL 2

94

31%

LEVEL 3

77

25%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

115
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

107

30%

LEVEL 2

131

37%

LEVEL 3

75

21%

LEVEL 4

40

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

50

20%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

75

31%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

49

17%

LEVEL 2

124

44%

LEVEL 3

71

25%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

56

84%

LEVEL 2

6

9%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

60

76%

LEVEL 2

13

16%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

47

27%

LEVEL 2

50

29%

LEVEL 3

54

32%

LEVEL 4

20

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

36

21%

LEVEL 2

59

34%

LEVEL 3

50

29%

LEVEL 4

27

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

59

42%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

73

38%

LEVEL 2

78

41%

LEVEL 3

26

14%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.