PEMBROKE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

52

15%

LEVEL 2

122

34%

LEVEL 3

115

32%

LEVEL 4

69

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

37

11%

LEVEL 2

125

39%

LEVEL 3

105

32%

LEVEL 4

57

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

23

13%

LEVEL 2

59

34%

LEVEL 3

58

33%

LEVEL 4

36

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

16

11%

LEVEL 2

56

37%

LEVEL 3

49

33%

LEVEL 4

29

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

29

16%

LEVEL 2

63

35%

LEVEL 3

57

31%

LEVEL 4

33

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

69

40%

LEVEL 3

56

32%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

10

67%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

173
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

46

14%

LEVEL 2

111

34%

LEVEL 3

106

32%

LEVEL 4

67

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

155
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

33

11%

LEVEL 2

110

37%

LEVEL 3

99

33%

LEVEL 4

56

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

104

34%

LEVEL 3

108

36%

LEVEL 4

69

23%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

98

36%

LEVEL 3

102

38%

LEVEL 4

57

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

29

54%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

25

45%

LEVEL 2

27

49%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

69

33%

LEVEL 3

74

35%

LEVEL 4

51

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

71

38%

LEVEL 3

66

35%

LEVEL 4

38

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

34

23%

LEVEL 2

53

36%

LEVEL 3

41

28%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

25

18%

LEVEL 2

54

39%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.