Skip to Content
Main content

MANOR INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

43

13%

LEVEL 2

60

19%

LEVEL 3

107

33%

LEVEL 4

113

35%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

41

12%

LEVEL 2

86

26%

LEVEL 3

102

31%

LEVEL 4

105

31%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

26

19%

LEVEL 3

51

36%

LEVEL 4

43

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

34

23%

LEVEL 3

54

36%

LEVEL 4

41

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

126
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

23

13%

LEVEL 2

34

19%

LEVEL 3

56

31%

LEVEL 4

70

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

64

35%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

203
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

36

12%

LEVEL 2

57

19%

LEVEL 3

96

32%

LEVEL 4

107

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

191
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

75

25%

LEVEL 3

95

32%

LEVEL 4

96

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

6

67%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

51

17%

LEVEL 3

104

35%

LEVEL 4

113

38%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

69

23%

LEVEL 3

101

34%

LEVEL 4

103

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

16

57%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

14

41%

LEVEL 2

17

50%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

203
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

51

18%

LEVEL 3

98

35%

LEVEL 4

105

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

186
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

65

24%

LEVEL 3

86

32%

LEVEL 4

100

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

16

38%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

8

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

24

36%

LEVEL 2

21

32%

LEVEL 3

16

24%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.