COBBLES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

23

12%

LEVEL 3

58

31%

LEVEL 4

100

53%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

34

17%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

106

53%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

15

16%

LEVEL 3

27

29%

LEVEL 4

47

51%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

16

16%

LEVEL 3

25

25%

LEVEL 4

56

57%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

31

32%

LEVEL 4

53

55%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

18

18%

LEVEL 3

28

28%

LEVEL 4

50

50%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

133
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

19

12%

LEVEL 3

46

29%

LEVEL 4

87

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

133
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

27

16%

LEVEL 3

45

27%

LEVEL 4

88

53%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

7

78%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

22

12%

LEVEL 3

55

31%

LEVEL 4

100

56%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

29

15%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

105

56%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

16

10%

LEVEL 3

48

31%

LEVEL 4

88

56%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

19

12%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

90

58%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

10

32%

LEVEL 4

12

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

16

35%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.