WILLIAMSON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

84

26%

LEVEL 2

118

36%

LEVEL 3

82

25%

LEVEL 4

44

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

105

28%

LEVEL 2

142

38%

LEVEL 3

77

21%

LEVEL 4

47

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

36

25%

LEVEL 2

46

32%

LEVEL 3

41

29%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

43

28%

LEVEL 2

55

36%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

48

26%

LEVEL 2

72

39%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

62

29%

LEVEL 2

87

40%

LEVEL 3

43

20%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

118
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

55

20%

LEVEL 2

98

36%

LEVEL 3

76

28%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

114
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

75

24%

LEVEL 2

119

39%

LEVEL 3

70

23%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

15

48%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

15

43%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

36

14%

LEVEL 2

108

41%

LEVEL 3

79

30%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

56

18%

LEVEL 2

132

43%

LEVEL 3

73

24%

LEVEL 4

47

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

48

77%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

49

78%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

26

15%

LEVEL 2

64

36%

LEVEL 3

53

30%

LEVEL 4

33

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

26

15%

LEVEL 2

74

43%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

29

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

58

38%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

79

40%

LEVEL 2

68

34%

LEVEL 3

33

17%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

125
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

81

25%

LEVEL 2

117

36%

LEVEL 3

82

25%

LEVEL 4

43

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

123
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

102

28%

LEVEL 2

141

39%

LEVEL 3

76

21%

LEVEL 4

47

13%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.