Skip to Content
Main content

NEW EXPLORATIONS SCI, TECH & MATH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

565
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 586

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

20

3%

LEVEL 3

91

16%

LEVEL 4

474

81%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

559
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

20

3%

LEVEL 3

83

14%

LEVEL 4

476

82%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

294
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

3%

LEVEL 3

52

17%

LEVEL 4

242

80%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

299
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

14

4%

LEVEL 3

48

15%

LEVEL 4

251

80%

MALE

PROFICIENT

271
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

11

4%

LEVEL 3

39

14%

LEVEL 4

232

82%

MALE

PROFICIENT

260
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

2%

LEVEL 3

35

13%

LEVEL 4

225

85%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

15

83%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

67%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

165
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

155

93%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

174
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

15

9%

LEVEL 4

159

90%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

292
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

2%

LEVEL 3

45

15%

LEVEL 4

247

83%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

279
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

3%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

239

83%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

41
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

20

42%

LEVEL 4

21

44%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

32
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

19

49%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

46
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

32

65%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

29

66%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

487
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 503

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

16

3%

LEVEL 3

73

15%

LEVEL 4

414

82%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

500
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

2%

LEVEL 3

71

14%

LEVEL 4

429

84%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

18

22%

LEVEL 4

60

72%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

47

68%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.