Skip to Content
Main content

CASIMIR PULASKI SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

76

30%

LEVEL 2

92

37%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

77

27%

LEVEL 2

103

36%

LEVEL 3

67

24%

LEVEL 4

38

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

31

29%

LEVEL 2

45

42%

LEVEL 3

22

20%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

34

28%

LEVEL 2

46

38%

LEVEL 3

28

23%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

45

31%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

36

25%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

43

26%

LEVEL 2

57

35%

LEVEL 3

39

24%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

9

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

36
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

13

16%

LEVEL 2

30

38%

LEVEL 3

27

34%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

21

19%

LEVEL 2

37

34%

LEVEL 3

32

30%

LEVEL 4

18

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

28

48%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

22

42%

LEVEL 2

20

38%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

30

33%

LEVEL 2

38

42%

LEVEL 3

17

19%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

28

29%

LEVEL 2

41

43%

LEVEL 3

18

19%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

41

20%

LEVEL 2

88

42%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

44

18%

LEVEL 2

98

41%

LEVEL 3

63

26%

LEVEL 4

36

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

35

83%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

33

75%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

83
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

73

30%

LEVEL 2

89

36%

LEVEL 3

57

23%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

105
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

72

26%

LEVEL 2

102

37%

LEVEL 3

67

24%

LEVEL 4

38

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

12

13%

LEVEL 2

31

33%

LEVEL 3

34

37%

LEVEL 4

16

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

14

11%

LEVEL 2

51

39%

LEVEL 3

40

30%

LEVEL 4

27

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

64

40%

LEVEL 2

61

38%

LEVEL 3

24

15%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

63

41%

LEVEL 2

52

34%

LEVEL 3

27

18%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.