Skip to Content
Main content

WAMPUS SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

354
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

36

7%

LEVEL 2

102

21%

LEVEL 3

180

37%

LEVEL 4

174

35%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

304
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

27

6%

LEVEL 2

99

23%

LEVEL 3

140

33%

LEVEL 4

164

38%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

170
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

64

25%

LEVEL 3

101

40%

LEVEL 4

69

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

82

38%

LEVEL 4

58

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

184
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

38

16%

LEVEL 3

79

33%

LEVEL 4

105

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

164
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

38

18%

LEVEL 3

58

27%

LEVEL 4

106

49%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

14

40%

LEVEL 4

18

51%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

11%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

17

61%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

301
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

33

8%

LEVEL 2

94

22%

LEVEL 3

155

36%

LEVEL 4

146

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

261
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

86

23%

LEVEL 3

122

33%

LEVEL 4

139

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

7

39%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

9

38%

LEVEL 4

6

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

340
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

10

2%

LEVEL 2

80

19%

LEVEL 3

168

39%

LEVEL 4

172

40%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

298
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

79

20%

LEVEL 3

136

35%

LEVEL 4

162

42%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

26

42%

LEVEL 2

22

35%

LEVEL 3

12

19%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

16

38%

LEVEL 2

20

48%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

351
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

36

7%

LEVEL 2

96

20%

LEVEL 3

178

37%

LEVEL 4

173

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

296
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

99

24%

LEVEL 3

136

33%

LEVEL 4

160

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.