Skip to Content
Main content

ROBERT E BELL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

461
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 589

LEVEL 1

28

5%

LEVEL 2

100

17%

LEVEL 3

193

33%

LEVEL 4

268

46%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

439
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

30

5%

LEVEL 2

87

16%

LEVEL 3

175

31%

LEVEL 4

264

47%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

209
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

47

18%

LEVEL 3

92

34%

LEVEL 4

117

44%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

215
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

44

16%

LEVEL 3

86

32%

LEVEL 4

129

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

252
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

53

17%

LEVEL 3

101

31%

LEVEL 4

151

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

224
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

43

15%

LEVEL 3

89

31%

LEVEL 4

135

48%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

28
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

12

34%

LEVEL 4

16

46%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

25
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

12

39%

LEVEL 4

13

42%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

67
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

16

22%

LEVEL 4

51

71%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

76
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

58

74%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

350
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

20

4%

LEVEL 2

77

17%

LEVEL 3

158

35%

LEVEL 4

192

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

319
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

24

6%

LEVEL 2

73

18%

LEVEL 3

133

32%

LEVEL 4

186

45%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

448
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

17

3%

LEVEL 2

79

15%

LEVEL 3

184

34%

LEVEL 4

264

49%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

427
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

15

3%

LEVEL 2

68

13%

LEVEL 3

166

33%

LEVEL 4

261

51%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

11

24%

LEVEL 2

21

47%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

15

33%

LEVEL 2

19

41%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

449
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

23

4%

LEVEL 2

92

16%

LEVEL 3

184

33%

LEVEL 4

265

47%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

429
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

26

5%

LEVEL 2

78

15%

LEVEL 3

173

32%

LEVEL 4

256

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

5

20%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

8

35%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.