HUDSON FALLS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 739

LEVEL 1

268

36%

LEVEL 2

247

33%

LEVEL 3

155

21%

LEVEL 4

69

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

229
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 741

LEVEL 1

238

32%

LEVEL 2

274

37%

LEVEL 3

138

19%

LEVEL 4

91

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

122

35%

LEVEL 2

128

36%

LEVEL 3

75

21%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

106

30%

LEVEL 2

134

38%

LEVEL 3

70

20%

LEVEL 4

40

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

123
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

146

38%

LEVEL 2

119

31%

LEVEL 3

80

21%

LEVEL 4

43

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

119
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

132

34%

LEVEL 2

140

36%

LEVEL 3

68

17%

LEVEL 4

51

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

9

28%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

7

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

209
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 669

LEVEL 1

238

36%

LEVEL 2

222

33%

LEVEL 3

148

22%

LEVEL 4

61

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

206
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 654

LEVEL 1

211

32%

LEVEL 2

237

36%

LEVEL 3

126

19%

LEVEL 4

80

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

12

30%

LEVEL 2

19

48%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 619

LEVEL 1

182

29%

LEVEL 2

219

35%

LEVEL 3

149

24%

LEVEL 4

69

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 580

LEVEL 1

130

22%

LEVEL 2

231

40%

LEVEL 3

131

23%

LEVEL 4

88

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

86

72%

LEVEL 2

28

23%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

108

67%

LEVEL 2

43

27%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

82

27%

LEVEL 2

94

31%

LEVEL 3

77

26%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

73

23%

LEVEL 2

113

35%

LEVEL 3

77

24%

LEVEL 4

60

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

186

42%

LEVEL 2

153

35%

LEVEL 3

78

18%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

165

39%

LEVEL 2

161

39%

LEVEL 3

61

15%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.