Skip to Content
Main content

GREENWICH CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

83

22%

LEVEL 2

143

38%

LEVEL 3

98

26%

LEVEL 4

52

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

76

18%

LEVEL 2

151

37%

LEVEL 3

117

28%

LEVEL 4

67

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

36

19%

LEVEL 2

75

40%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

81

40%

LEVEL 3

57

28%

LEVEL 4

33

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

47

25%

LEVEL 2

68

36%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

45

22%

LEVEL 2

70

33%

LEVEL 3

60

29%

LEVEL 4

34

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

144
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

82

22%

LEVEL 2

140

38%

LEVEL 3

94

26%

LEVEL 4

50

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

176
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

70

18%

LEVEL 2

147

37%

LEVEL 3

114

29%

LEVEL 4

62

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

43

14%

LEVEL 2

126

40%

LEVEL 3

92

29%

LEVEL 4

51

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

39

11%

LEVEL 2

129

37%

LEVEL 3

114

33%

LEVEL 4

67

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

40

63%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

37

60%

LEVEL 2

22

35%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

98

37%

LEVEL 3

88

33%

LEVEL 4

46

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

157
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

94

33%

LEVEL 3

98

35%

LEVEL 4

59

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

47

44%

LEVEL 2

45

42%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

44

34%

LEVEL 2

57

45%

LEVEL 3

19

15%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.