Skip to Content
Main content

NEWFIELD CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

85

31%

LEVEL 2

115

42%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

78

32%

LEVEL 2

93

38%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

44

33%

LEVEL 2

52

39%

LEVEL 3

27

20%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

43

32%

LEVEL 2

49

36%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

41

29%

LEVEL 2

63

45%

LEVEL 3

25

18%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

35

32%

LEVEL 2

44

40%

LEVEL 3

17

15%

LEVEL 4

14

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

70
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

72

29%

LEVEL 2

104

42%

LEVEL 3

50

20%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

65
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

60

29%

LEVEL 2

83

40%

LEVEL 3

36

17%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

9

47%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

11

61%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

39

18%

LEVEL 2

106

49%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

43

21%

LEVEL 2

86

43%

LEVEL 3

41

20%

LEVEL 4

32

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

46

79%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

35

81%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

26

23%

LEVEL 2

45

39%

LEVEL 3

31

27%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

19

22%

LEVEL 2

37

42%

LEVEL 3

15

17%

LEVEL 4

17

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

59

37%

LEVEL 2

70

44%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

59

38%

LEVEL 2

56

36%

LEVEL 3

27

17%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.