Skip to Content
Main content

DRYDEN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

187

35%

LEVEL 2

179

34%

LEVEL 3

119

22%

LEVEL 4

48

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

161

34%

LEVEL 2

164

35%

LEVEL 3

93

20%

LEVEL 4

57

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

90

34%

LEVEL 2

97

36%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

66

30%

LEVEL 2

92

42%

LEVEL 3

38

18%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

97

36%

LEVEL 2

82

31%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

95

37%

LEVEL 2

72

28%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

36

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

10

45%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

154
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

172

35%

LEVEL 2

168

34%

LEVEL 3

112

23%

LEVEL 4

42

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

136
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

148

34%

LEVEL 2

150

35%

LEVEL 3

83

19%

LEVEL 4

53

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

109

25%

LEVEL 2

163

37%

LEVEL 3

119

27%

LEVEL 4

48

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

89

23%

LEVEL 2

154

39%

LEVEL 3

92

24%

LEVEL 4

56

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

78

83%

LEVEL 2

16

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

72

86%

LEVEL 2

10

12%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

59

21%

LEVEL 2

91

33%

LEVEL 3

86

31%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

46

19%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

67

28%

LEVEL 4

46

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

128

50%

LEVEL 2

88

34%

LEVEL 3

33

13%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

115

49%

LEVEL 2

81

35%

LEVEL 3

26

11%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.