Skip to Content
Main content

SPENCER-VAN ETTEN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

103

30%

LEVEL 2

123

36%

LEVEL 3

71

21%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

65

18%

LEVEL 2

139

39%

LEVEL 3

92

25%

LEVEL 4

65

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

44

28%

LEVEL 2

64

40%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

20

12%

LEVEL 2

71

43%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

29

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

59

32%

LEVEL 2

59

32%

LEVEL 3

37

20%

LEVEL 4

29

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

45

23%

LEVEL 2

68

35%

LEVEL 3

46

24%

LEVEL 4

36

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

112
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

99

30%

LEVEL 2

116

35%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

43

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

60

18%

LEVEL 2

129

38%

LEVEL 3

87

26%

LEVEL 4

62

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

61

21%

LEVEL 2

118

40%

LEVEL 3

70

24%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

35

11%

LEVEL 2

125

40%

LEVEL 3

90

29%

LEVEL 4

64

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

42

86%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

30

64%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

43

28%

LEVEL 4

32

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

46

31%

LEVEL 3

47

32%

LEVEL 4

42

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

76

40%

LEVEL 2

74

39%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

53

25%

LEVEL 2

93

43%

LEVEL 3

45

21%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.