Skip to Content
Main content

NEWARK VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

95

36%

LEVEL 2

102

39%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

76

27%

LEVEL 2

112

40%

LEVEL 3

62

22%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

42

34%

LEVEL 2

51

41%

LEVEL 3

20

16%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

36

24%

LEVEL 2

56

37%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

53

38%

LEVEL 2

51

37%

LEVEL 3

20

14%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

40

31%

LEVEL 2

56

43%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

92

36%

LEVEL 2

100

39%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

88
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

72

27%

LEVEL 2

109

41%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

61

27%

LEVEL 2

96

43%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

49

20%

LEVEL 2

109

44%

LEVEL 3

61

24%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

34

85%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

27

87%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

36

25%

LEVEL 2

59

41%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

26

17%

LEVEL 2

65

41%

LEVEL 3

44

28%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

59

50%

LEVEL 2

43

36%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

50

40%

LEVEL 2

47

38%

LEVEL 3

18

15%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.