Skip to Content
Main content

GREAT HOLLOW MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

120

41%

LEVEL 3

105

35%

LEVEL 4

43

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

106

36%

LEVEL 3

114

39%

LEVEL 4

54

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

59

43%

LEVEL 3

47

34%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

48

37%

LEVEL 3

51

40%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

58

37%

LEVEL 4

27

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

63

38%

LEVEL 4

35

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

11

33%

LEVEL 4

12

36%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

9

30%

LEVEL 4

9

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

115
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

95

42%

LEVEL 3

87

38%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

134
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

77

34%

LEVEL 3

91

40%

LEVEL 4

43

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

15

60%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

12

46%

LEVEL 3

10

38%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

111

41%

LEVEL 3

103

38%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

97

36%

LEVEL 3

111

41%

LEVEL 4

54

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

11

50%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

10

45%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

110

40%

LEVEL 3

100

36%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

157
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

99

37%

LEVEL 3

107

39%

LEVEL 4

50

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

10

48%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.