Skip to Content
Main content

JAMES H BOYD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

59

16%

LEVEL 2

101

27%

LEVEL 3

126

34%

LEVEL 4

89

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

202
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

34

11%

LEVEL 2

78

25%

LEVEL 3

104

33%

LEVEL 4

98

31%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

27

15%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

58

33%

LEVEL 4

36

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

13

10%

LEVEL 2

38

28%

LEVEL 3

50

37%

LEVEL 4

35

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

121
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

46

23%

LEVEL 3

68

34%

LEVEL 4

53

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

117
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

40

22%

LEVEL 3

54

30%

LEVEL 4

63

35%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

6

55%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

22

55%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

11

30%

LEVEL 4

13

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

150
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

28

12%

LEVEL 2

58

25%

LEVEL 3

81

34%

LEVEL 4

69

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

34

17%

LEVEL 3

77

39%

LEVEL 4

72

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

10

37%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

7

35%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

18

30%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

18

30%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

9

18%

LEVEL 2

22

44%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

8

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

43

12%

LEVEL 2

96

27%

LEVEL 3

124

35%

LEVEL 4

89

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

73

25%

LEVEL 3

103

36%

LEVEL 4

94

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

16

70%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

16

62%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

212
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

44

13%

LEVEL 2

94

27%

LEVEL 3

123

35%

LEVEL 4

89

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

200
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

68

23%

LEVEL 3

102

35%

LEVEL 4

98

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

15

60%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

10

48%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

188
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

71

24%

LEVEL 3

103

35%

LEVEL 4

85

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

180
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

51

20%

LEVEL 3

93

37%

LEVEL 4

87

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

27

32%

LEVEL 2

30

36%

LEVEL 3

23

27%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

13

21%

LEVEL 2

27

44%

LEVEL 3

11

18%

LEVEL 4

11

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.