JOSEPH A EDGAR INTERMEDIATE SCH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

51

26%

LEVEL 2

65

34%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

30

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

43

27%

LEVEL 2

65

40%

LEVEL 3

37

23%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

26

28%

LEVEL 2

33

35%

LEVEL 3

22

24%

LEVEL 4

12

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

24

28%

LEVEL 2

36

42%

LEVEL 3

17

20%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

25

25%

LEVEL 2

32

32%

LEVEL 3

26

26%

LEVEL 4

18

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

19

25%

LEVEL 2

29

38%

LEVEL 3

20

26%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

67
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

34

22%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

26

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

44
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

25

22%

LEVEL 2

46

40%

LEVEL 3

31

27%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

12

40%

LEVEL 2

13

43%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

17

53%

LEVEL 2

12

38%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

40

22%

LEVEL 2

64

36%

LEVEL 3

45

25%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

34

23%

LEVEL 2

62

42%

LEVEL 3

35

24%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

11

73%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

9

64%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

32

23%

LEVEL 2

44

32%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

23

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

21

19%

LEVEL 2

42

39%

LEVEL 3

32

30%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

19

34%

LEVEL 2

21

38%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

22

42%

LEVEL 2

23

43%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.