HORNELL CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

179

42%

LEVEL 2

146

34%

LEVEL 3

79

18%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 653

LEVEL 1

296

45%

LEVEL 2

224

34%

LEVEL 3

103

16%

LEVEL 4

30

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

80

41%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

40

21%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

133

42%

LEVEL 2

122

38%

LEVEL 3

46

14%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

99

42%

LEVEL 2

85

36%

LEVEL 3

39

17%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

163

49%

LEVEL 2

102

31%

LEVEL 3

57

17%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

17

57%

LEVEL 2

11

37%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

155

40%

LEVEL 2

135

35%

LEVEL 3

70

18%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

255

44%

LEVEL 2

201

35%

LEVEL 3

96

17%

LEVEL 4

27

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

12

67%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

14

67%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

127

35%

LEVEL 2

136

37%

LEVEL 3

76

21%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

202

37%

LEVEL 2

214

39%

LEVEL 3

102

19%

LEVEL 4

29

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

52

80%

LEVEL 2

10

15%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

94

89%

LEVEL 2

10

9%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

40

27%

LEVEL 2

58

39%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

55

27%

LEVEL 2

83

41%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

139

50%

LEVEL 2

88

31%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

241

53%

LEVEL 2

141

31%

LEVEL 3

59

13%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.