Skip to Content
Main content

CAMPBELL-SAVONA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

97

29%

LEVEL 2

143

43%

LEVEL 3

71

21%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

89

25%

LEVEL 2

138

39%

LEVEL 3

85

24%

LEVEL 4

45

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

45

27%

LEVEL 2

74

44%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

44

25%

LEVEL 2

68

38%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

52

32%

LEVEL 2

69

42%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

45

25%

LEVEL 2

70

39%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

89
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

93

29%

LEVEL 2

140

43%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

85

25%

LEVEL 2

135

39%

LEVEL 3

82

24%

LEVEL 4

44

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

59

22%

LEVEL 2

125

46%

LEVEL 3

67

25%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

48

16%

LEVEL 2

127

43%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

38

62%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

41

66%

LEVEL 2

11

18%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

38

26%

LEVEL 2

57

39%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

24

16%

LEVEL 2

57

38%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

30

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

59

32%

LEVEL 2

86

47%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

65

32%

LEVEL 2

81

40%

LEVEL 3

44

21%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.