WATERLOO CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

93

29%

LEVEL 2

118

37%

LEVEL 3

70

22%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

84

25%

LEVEL 2

117

35%

LEVEL 3

77

23%

LEVEL 4

54

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

37

26%

LEVEL 2

50

36%

LEVEL 3

33

24%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

36

23%

LEVEL 2

53

34%

LEVEL 3

43

28%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

56

32%

LEVEL 2

68

39%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

48

27%

LEVEL 2

64

36%

LEVEL 3

34

19%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

91
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

80

28%

LEVEL 2

111

39%

LEVEL 3

60

21%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

120
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

71

24%

LEVEL 2

104

35%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

49

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

111

44%

LEVEL 3

68

27%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

45

16%

LEVEL 2

111

39%

LEVEL 3

74

26%

LEVEL 4

54

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

54

86%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

39

81%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

42

26%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

41

26%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

51

33%

LEVEL 2

62

40%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.