SENECA FALLS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

126

30%

LEVEL 2

135

32%

LEVEL 3

113

27%

LEVEL 4

44

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

145

31%

LEVEL 2

150

32%

LEVEL 3

110

24%

LEVEL 4

62

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

56

28%

LEVEL 2

70

35%

LEVEL 3

56

28%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

64

28%

LEVEL 2

82

35%

LEVEL 3

53

23%

LEVEL 4

33

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

70

32%

LEVEL 2

65

30%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

81

34%

LEVEL 2

68

29%

LEVEL 3

57

24%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

13

37%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

142
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

94

27%

LEVEL 2

113

32%

LEVEL 3

102

29%

LEVEL 4

40

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

144
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

101

27%

LEVEL 2

124

34%

LEVEL 3

95

26%

LEVEL 4

49

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

11

69%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

13

68%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

10

53%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

13

42%

LEVEL 2

8

26%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

82

22%

LEVEL 2

130

35%

LEVEL 3

112

30%

LEVEL 4

44

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

96

24%

LEVEL 2

140

34%

LEVEL 3

108

27%

LEVEL 4

62

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

44

88%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

49

80%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

71

31%

LEVEL 3

81

36%

LEVEL 4

35

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

45

19%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

71

30%

LEVEL 4

42

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

86

45%

LEVEL 2

64

34%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

100

43%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

39

17%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.