Skip to Content
Main content

SCOTIA-GLENVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

285
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 708

LEVEL 1

179

25%

LEVEL 2

244

34%

LEVEL 3

190

27%

LEVEL 4

95

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

322
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 678

LEVEL 1

134

20%

LEVEL 2

222

33%

LEVEL 3

188

28%

LEVEL 4

134

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

73

23%

LEVEL 2

115

36%

LEVEL 3

89

28%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

142
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

54

18%

LEVEL 2

108

36%

LEVEL 3

81

27%

LEVEL 4

61

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

157
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

106

27%

LEVEL 2

129

33%

LEVEL 3

101

26%

LEVEL 4

56

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

180
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

80

21%

LEVEL 2

114

30%

LEVEL 3

107

29%

LEVEL 4

73

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

270
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 650

LEVEL 1

157

24%

LEVEL 2

223

34%

LEVEL 3

176

27%

LEVEL 4

94

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

304
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 625

LEVEL 1

118

19%

LEVEL 2

203

32%

LEVEL 3

175

28%

LEVEL 4

129

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

15

58%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

275
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 604

LEVEL 1

105

17%

LEVEL 2

224

37%

LEVEL 3

181

30%

LEVEL 4

94

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

313
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 596

LEVEL 1

81

14%

LEVEL 2

202

34%

LEVEL 3

181

30%

LEVEL 4

132

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

74

71%

LEVEL 2

20

19%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

53

65%

LEVEL 2

20

24%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

231
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

93

19%

LEVEL 2

175

35%

LEVEL 3

147

29%

LEVEL 4

84

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

269
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

74

15%

LEVEL 2

146

30%

LEVEL 3

145

30%

LEVEL 4

124

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

86

41%

LEVEL 2

69

33%

LEVEL 3

43

21%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

60

32%

LEVEL 2

76

40%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.