OLIVER W WINCH MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

112

22%

LEVEL 2

205

40%

LEVEL 3

141

27%

LEVEL 4

55

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

108

21%

LEVEL 2

209

41%

LEVEL 3

114

23%

LEVEL 4

74

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

41

17%

LEVEL 2

99

40%

LEVEL 3

78

32%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

47

20%

LEVEL 2

99

41%

LEVEL 3

61

25%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

71

26%

LEVEL 2

106

40%

LEVEL 3

63

24%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

61

23%

LEVEL 2

110

42%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

40

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

190
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

103

21%

LEVEL 2

195

40%

LEVEL 3

136

28%

LEVEL 4

54

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

181
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

98

21%

LEVEL 2

196

41%

LEVEL 3

109

23%

LEVEL 4

72

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

72

16%

LEVEL 2

180

41%

LEVEL 3

136

31%

LEVEL 4

55

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

57

13%

LEVEL 2

191

44%

LEVEL 3

111

26%

LEVEL 4

73

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

40

57%

LEVEL 2

25

36%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

51

70%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

156
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

54

16%

LEVEL 2

132

39%

LEVEL 3

112

33%

LEVEL 4

44

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

134

41%

LEVEL 3

91

28%

LEVEL 4

60

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

58

34%

LEVEL 2

73

43%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

63

36%

LEVEL 2

75

43%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.