MECHANICVILLE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

127

33%

LEVEL 2

138

36%

LEVEL 3

67

17%

LEVEL 4

54

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

140

32%

LEVEL 2

156

35%

LEVEL 3

99

22%

LEVEL 4

49

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

62

36%

LEVEL 2

65

37%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

61

31%

LEVEL 2

73

37%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

65

31%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

34

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

79

32%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

56

23%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

110
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

121

33%

LEVEL 2

131

36%

LEVEL 3

60

17%

LEVEL 4

50

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

131

32%

LEVEL 2

142

35%

LEVEL 3

92

22%

LEVEL 4

45

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

95

28%

LEVEL 2

132

38%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

53

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

109

27%

LEVEL 2

143

36%

LEVEL 3

96

24%

LEVEL 4

49

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

32

78%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

31

66%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

57

26%

LEVEL 2

73

33%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

43

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

62

23%

LEVEL 2

105

38%

LEVEL 3

71

26%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

70

43%

LEVEL 2

65

40%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

78

46%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

28

17%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.