Skip to Content
Main content

CORINTH CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

132

36%

LEVEL 2

149

40%

LEVEL 3

72

20%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

138

37%

LEVEL 2

138

37%

LEVEL 3

69

18%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

68

36%

LEVEL 2

77

41%

LEVEL 3

37

20%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

67

36%

LEVEL 2

71

38%

LEVEL 3

29

16%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

64

35%

LEVEL 2

72

40%

LEVEL 3

35

19%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

71

37%

LEVEL 2

67

35%

LEVEL 3

40

21%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

85
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

129

36%

LEVEL 2

145

40%

LEVEL 3

69

19%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

136

37%

LEVEL 2

132

36%

LEVEL 3

67

18%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

104

31%

LEVEL 2

144

43%

LEVEL 3

72

21%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

116

34%

LEVEL 2

128

37%

LEVEL 3

69

20%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

28

85%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

22

67%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

42

23%

LEVEL 2

76

42%

LEVEL 3

49

27%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

52

28%

LEVEL 2

60

32%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

90

47%

LEVEL 2

73

38%

LEVEL 3

23

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

86

45%

LEVEL 2

78

41%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.